Monday, September 14, 2015
Meeting Students' Needs
I am interested in writing about a couple of components of the first article on flexible grouping, and am struck by the "art and science" analogy the authors use to describe how teachers need to differentiate instruction.
When I am creating the group assignments I will need to go back to my student questionnaire responses from the first day of school, and I will have to assess the value of placing like-minded students in the same group. Do I want all of my "love social studies" respondents to be in one group, or shall I place these students in several different groups to spread the love around as it were? Similarly, do I want to place my "social studies is not my favorite" students to be spread around as well? My initial thought is to spread these students around.
The authors tend to think that like-ability students should be spread around in various groups rathar than placed on one group. I will go and check the district's resources on middle school grades and testing events to ensure that I have placed varying abilities around the groups in each section of the course.
One thing I can do in the class to ensure that groups have varying abilities and interests is to have the students complete a writing piece before placement. I would be able to estimate the writing ability from a formative assessment such as this.
Authenticity is a big component of PBL according to the authors. We have had some experience writing authentic performance tasks from our school's usage of common core persuasive writing assignments in the last two years. I prepared a huge performance task assignment base on Argentina's Peron family for history class a couple of years ago, so I am familiar with creating performance tasks. The PBL requirement of a "product" is quite similar to the performance task assessment in common core. I will lead the students toward creating their deeper-connection end task "product" as the authors indicate. Working to meet the needs of each student is the prime goal of the PBL differentiated instruction, and providing an authentic assessment is the tool to ensure that each child's needs can best be met.
In the second article about Oakland Elementary, I am struck by a couple of pieces of information.
The authors write that Rome wasn't built in a day and the process of laying a brick at a time was arguably more important than the end result. This reminds me of the conversation I had with my PLC when we met with Mr. Winney, our Freshman Academy AP.
When I explained the PBL to Mr. Winney. I let him know that in PBL while the standards are important the process of reaching the standards is just as important, the process being the way in which the students learn the soft skills that are essential to the "Profile of the South Carolina Graduate," and the 4 C's. "Students must extract information to communicate their own personal understanding in an original way," as the authors said, was the essence of what I told Mr. Winney. He understood and agreed that World Geography is a good place to undertake experimental learning processes such as via the PBL format.
I also met later with our building CRT Mrs. Jenny Norris and explained to her about what our PLC is working toward in terms of authenticity and PBL. She agreed with Mr. Winney's idea that 9th grade social studies is a great place to begin the process of setting PBL as a building priority for instruction.
The authors of the piece talk about establishing and re-establishing goals for the school's continuous improvement. Implementation of PBL can, for Woodmont HS, be part of the SIC program, and I am reminded that I still need to contact the leaders on this committee at our school.
As a side note about schools that are implementing PBL, I want to acknowledge Monarch Elementary, which like Oakland may be transformative. Our neighborhood happens to be zoned for Monarch Elementary's geocode group in Greenville County. The word has gotten around that Monarch is a wonderful school, and now many many families with young students are seeking too enroll in Monarch. The only real way in which a family can do this is by buying a house in the geocode that attends the school. Thus, demand for homes in our neighborhood have skyrocketed with a resulting price increase for homes in the neighborhood! PBL is paying off for our neighborhood! And the realtors in the area sell the Five Forks area as a Monarch geocode! Funny, isn't it? I love it, and I hope when my husband and I downsize in a couple of years it pays off for us! PBL rocks! I hope that eventually people want Woodmont HS because of the PBL instructional format as well!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Sally,
ReplyDeleteI am impressed at how many people at Woodmont HS that you have shared PBL with. I think the Freshman Academy is a great place to start PBL. I have discussed my PBL Unit with the Economics teachers. They like the project but feel it is something that they will do at the end of the semester if there is time. I am doing it throughout the semester and think that it will be great. So far so god.
After reading Building school communities one brick at a time and Navigating the intricacies of PBL. I feel that implementing PBL is possible. As we are laying the foundation one brick at a time I believe that we must be flexible and not so rigid. The intricacies of PBL and grouping is the laying of the foundation bricks by brick. Once we assess our students with a formative test we can then spread them out into PBL groups. At this point we need to have a hands off approach and be the facilitator.
ReplyDeleteWe also need to build teacher buy in. We need to share PBL until the whole school buys in. When this happens amazing results will happen school wide and further as time goes on.
We need to reach out to our community. Once we get the community to buy in then we can make some real world connections
First, I want to say that it is great to see the PBL gang again. I enjoyed getting to know you this summer and look forward to continuing our learning and collaboration. Richard, I have had some similar responses from colleagues - we will try to "fit the PBL unit in at the end of the semester." But I will say several of my social studies colleagues are interested and willing to collaborate and implement PBL.
ReplyDeleteGood to see you to Carly. I will keep on talking about it. Hopefully between Sally and I we will be able to get this going around Woodmont.
Delete"Building School Communities One Brick At A Time" offered some helpful advice to be sure, but I know the road to changing from traditional teaching to TRUE PBL is a long one. Yes, it is possible and I do not mean to be cynical. I know part of the battle is the attitude many educators have about "the flavor of the month." I admit I have fallen into the trap as well. We are often bombarded with new methodologies, which are said to be the savior of education. I think our speaker made such a great point - we need to push this from the grassroots level. If we as classroom teachers can build a program and show our enthusiasm and success, others will take notice. Measurable results will be needed, but I foresee a jump in student achievement through PBL. Let's just say I am cautiously optimistic.
ReplyDeleteCarly I completely agree with being cautious. We both know that we are backed completely in this PBL opportunity but what is going to happen if we get a new administration next year. You know I am a firm believer in teaching with projects. I am currently trying the mousetrap car as my first PBL activity and I have found that students want their phones to think for them. I definitely think if this is implemented in elementary and middle schools by the time they get to us it should be easier.
DeleteThe second article is one I look forward to discussing further, to get ideas from the group on the pitfalls of grouping. I see that differentiation is helpful -- I would say my methodology to date has been to work toward groups of diverse learners with strengths that will compliment one another. For example, putting some of the more outgoing students, with those who are shy about presenting or putting a creative student with one who is more analytical. I understand the importance of tailoring instruction to meet the needs of different students and I too work to ensure I do not create fixed-ability groups. PBL is such a great tool for instructional tailoring!
ReplyDeleteSally, I am impressed with the way you are able to sell the PBL class to your professional community. You inspired me to start talking about the class and the things that I am doing with my students in my classes with my fellow educators. For differentiation, I am trying to put the students in groups from the data collected from personality testing. I use the Myer`s and Brigg`s personality test in my class and have a personality board in my class which reminds the student about their personality and also which makes other students aware of the personality type of their fellow students.
ReplyDeleteI believe that it is important to have students with different sets of skillset and brain set work together and thus, I adapted this form of grouping.
Jigna,
DeleteI agree with you that we do need students with different skill sets and learning levels working together.
I also agree that students with different skill sets need to learn to work together. After all, isn't this what happens in business all the time? I constantly tell students that they need to learn to work with all in the class not just their friends. Life is diverse and so must we be.
DeleteSally I love your enthusiasm and know that the great people of the Woodmont community will love it too. You are very encouraging to all as we are going through this process. The change begins with innovative thinkers like you who are willing to get out of that comfort zone! :)
ReplyDeleteAs the self-proclaimed Monarch representative of the group, I am so happy to see that realtors are using us as a selling point! Amazing how schools can impact so much of the community. Most of the time, I feel like I'm working in a bubble and have no idea what is going on beyond my classroom door. That brought a smile to my face--we must be doing something right! Some days (like today), I feel like I question everything I'm doing in my classroom and worry that I'm not being "project-based" enough, so thank you for that vote of confidence, Sally! I do admire your ability to speak up and speak out. We can do this!
ReplyDeleteSally -
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comments. As you spoke of flexible grouping, I appreciated your mentioning of the continued use of student questionnaires. I must admit that as a young educator, I too, gave out the traditional "start-of-year" questionnaires. I used the information to profile my class within my Long Range Plans and neatly placed the questionnaires away in my filing cabinet, only to discard them at the end of the year when making space for my new group of students. As you said, it is important that we utilize these questionnaires, asking our students to update their information periodically throughout the year. I had one teacher friend who would intentionally utilize at least one piece of information from the questionnaires to highlight every student at some point throughout the year. Utilizing this information within PBL units can easily address one or more of the 8 essentials.
I must say I also appreciated this statement, "Working to meet the needs of each student is the prime goal of the PBL differentiated instruction, and providing an authentic assessment is the tool to ensure that each child's needs can best be met." YES! You nailed it! PBL and inquiry-based learning is a tool, a way of thinking to help each, individual student grow! We can't expect to be within a PBL unit every day of the year but we should be intentional in knowing our students, their data, their strengths and weaknesses, and their interest (student questionnaires) so that when we are in a unit that we can unitize this information to maximize our efforts in advancing student engagement, advocacy, and achievement! Thank you again for your thoughts and reflection!